لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔
Case files may also be accessed from the public access terminals while in the clerk’s office on the court where the case was filed.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal advice or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed on the court in which the case is or will be filed.
The mentioned recovery can be used, in the most, for corroboration on the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be considered a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of prevalence. The stated memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as almost nothing was discovered as a result of these types of pointation. The place of prevalence in addition to the place of throwing the dead body were already inside the knowledge of witnesses just before their pointation because of the petitioners. Reliance is also placed on case regulation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it's been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
The different roles of case legislation in civil and common legislation traditions create differences in the way in which that courts render decisions. Common law courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale driving their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the broader legal principles.
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment on the grid project and submitted that sufficient mitigation measures were in place to render any prospective adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to get crafted.
In almost any society, the enforcement of legislation and order is essential to maintain peace and protect its citizens. One of the most severe crimes that can disrupt this harmony is murder. In Pakistan, Section 302 in the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) deals with the punishment for murder, and its enforcement is very important to be certain justice prevails.
The law as proven in previous court rulings; like common regulation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
I) The above referred case FIR, to the murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered over the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid that is father of the petitioner and as per Tale of FIR, the petitioner can be an eyewkness from the incidence.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It requires the execution with the convicted person as being a consequence of their crime.
, which is Latin for “stand read more by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling about the same type of case.
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition to your Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Development Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of the electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter being a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) of the Pakistan Constitution gives authentic jurisdiction for the Supreme Court to consider up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
competent authority has determined the eligibility of your private respondents and found them to get fit for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)